DOI - Mendel University Press

DOI identifiers

DOI: 10.11118/978-80-7509-904-4-0057

EXPLORING THE RECREATIONAL POTENTIAL OF URBAN GAPS

Tímea Žolobaničová, Miroslav Čibik, Roberta Štěpánková

In the process of continuous urbanization, planning errors sometimes appear. Urban structures are loosened, and places are created that do not have a clearly defined function. Empty spaces between two elements have several definitions and terms. One of them is vacant lot. Vacant lot, if they are not built up in a short period of time, they become “lost places” that are out of control and out of order and consequently create green chaos in the city. This brings a new diversity to the urban structure and the possibility of recreation near residential buildings. Vacant lots have become part of the city for many decades and many undeveloped plots of land create an oasis of greenery within the urban environment. People have started to visit such places spontaneously and use them for daily recreation. Often it is no longer possible to bring them back into the city system because people have become accustomed to the greenery in their surroundings and do not always want to exchange it for a new building or a parking lot. A gap full of greenery provides a lot of freedom for visitors to recreate, unlike a city park which is strictly regulated. In such places, animals and plants are beginning to appear in addition to people. Many plants and animals have a presence and a safe territory in the space until the gap is of interest to urban planners or developers. At that point, the chaos becomes an asset and conservation becomes a priority for its visitors. In city centres, there is an emergence of recreational potential that needs to be explored and redesigned through low-cost interventions in the urban environment. This reduces the costs of maintenance, and transport for recreation.

Keywords: recreation, urban voids, terrain vague, gap-sites, vacant lot

pages: 57-62, Published: 2023, online: 2023



References

  1. Back Prochnow, S., Čibik, M. (2022). Unconventional Interventions on Redeveloping Unused Urban Landscapes Based on Social Interactions. Acta Horticulturae et Regiotectuare, 25(1), 92-98. Go to original source...
  2. Calvino, I. (1997). Invisible cities. Vintage publishing, pp. 160. ISBN 978-00-994-2983- 8
  3. Carr, S. et al. (1992). Public Space. Cambridge: University Press, pp 400. ISBN 780-52-135-9601-3
  4. Clément, G. (2016). Manifeste du Tiers paysage. DU COMMUN, pp. 60. ISBN 979-10- 956-3005-0
  5. Cément, G. (2016). Not absolute control. In: Landscape teory. [online] Available at: https:/landscapetheory1.wordpress.com/tag/gilles-clement/
  6. EZOP 257. (2016) PSÁT O MĚSTĚ: EZOP 257 - Graffiti, pohyb městem. Available at: https:/www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAUvAqQQHf4
  7. Haluzík, R. (ed.) a kol. (2020). Mesto naruby Vágní terén, vnitřní periferie a místa medzi místy . Praha: Academia, 400 s. ISBN 978-80-200-3041-2
  8. Haluzíková, Ľ. (2020). Vágni Praha: studio work. Praha: FA ČVUT, Praha.
  9. Lososová, Z. et. al. (2011). Diversity of Central European urban biota: effects of human-made habitat types on plants and land snails. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02475.x Go to original source...
  10. Marišová, E., Fandel, P. (2021). Basic visions of Slovakia's environmental strategies: a case study in two selected regions. Strategy and innovations in the raw materials policy of the Slovak Republic and the EU - historical development of the importance of raw materials. Book of abstracts. 2022, pp.104
  11. Mariš, M.,Marišová, E. (2021). Innovations in Waste Enterprising: TheApproaches to Waste Recovery, Innovative business and start-ups in current business environment, pp. 48.
  12. Picon, A. (2000) "Anxious Landscapes: From the Ruin to Rust." Translated by Karen Bates. Grey Room 1 (September), 64-83. DOI:10.1162/152638100750173065. Go to original source...
  13. Sádlo, J. (2019). KRAJINA!. Kodulek. pp. 78-120. ISBN 978-80-906-3115-1
  14. Trancik, R. (1986). Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design. Wiley. ISBN 978-04-712-8956-2
  15. Vitková, Ľ. (2015). Methods of evaluating public spaces. Alfa Stuba,33. Available at: https://alfa.stuba.sk/wpcontent/uploads/2020/05/1_2015_4_Vitková-1.pdf
  16. Witting, R. (2004). The origin and development of the urban flora of Central Eu- rop. Urban Ecosystem, 7, 323-329. DOI: 10.1007/s11252-005-6833-9 Go to original source...
  17. Žolobaničová, T. (2022). Stratené miesta města. Diploma thesis. Nitra: ÚKA, FZKI, SPU in Nitra.