DOI - Mendel University Press

DOI identifiers

DOI: 10.11118/978-80-7701-047-4-0076

CONSUMER PROTECTION MECHANISMS IN EU REGULATORY SANDBOXES

Jana Janderová1
1 Institute of Administrative and Social Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Pardubice, Studentská 84, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic

Regulatory sandboxes have emerged as pivotal tools in fostering innovation within the financial and technological sectors. This article explores the concept of regulatory sandboxes, focusing on their legal regulation under European Union (EU) law and the critical role of regulators in ensuring consumer protection. The EU’s approach to regulatory sandboxes is characterized by a flexible yet robust framework that allows for the controlled testing of innovative products and services. This framework aims to balance the need for innovation with the imperative of safeguarding consumer interests. The article delves into the legal foundations of regulatory sandboxes within the EU, examining key legislative instruments and policy initiatives that support their implementation. It highlights the European Commission’s efforts to harmonize the AI sandbox regulations across member states, promoting a cohesive and efficient regulatory environment. A significant focus is placed on consumer protection, detailing how regulators ought to implement safeguards to mitigate risks associated with new technologies. In conclusion, the article argues that regulatory sandboxes, when effectively regulated and supervised, can serve as powerful catalysts for innovation while maintaining high standards of consumer protection.

Keywords: regulatory sandbox, consumer protection, FinTech, innovation, artificial intelligence, EU law, regulators

pages: 76-86, online: 2025



References

  1. ALAASSAR, A., MENTION, A., and AAS, T. H. 2021. Exploring a new incubation model for FinTechs: Regulatory sandboxes. Technovation. 103, 102237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102237 Go to original source...
  2. ALLEN, H. J. 2024. Regulating fintech: A harm focused approach. Computer Law & Security Review. 52, 105910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105910 Go to original source...
  3. BROWN, E., PIROSKA, D. 2022 Governing Fintech and Fintech as Governance: The Regulatory Sandbox, Riskwashing, and Disruptive Social Classification. New Political Economy. 27(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13563467.2021.1910645 Go to original source...
  4. BUOCZA, T., PFOTENHAUERB, S., EISENBERGERC, I. 2023. Regulatory sandboxes in the AI Act: reconciling innovation and safety? Law, innovation and technology. 15(2), 357-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2023.2245678 Go to original source...
  5. Council of the EU. 2020. Conclusions on Regulatory sandboxes and experimentation clauses as tools for an innovation-friendly, future-proof and resilient regulatory framework that masters disruptive challenges in the digital age, OJ C447/1. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-13026-2020-INIT/en/pdf
  6. European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA, ESMA). 2019. Fintech: Regulatory Sandboxes and Innovation Hubs. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/jc_2018_74_joint_report_on_regulatory_sandboxes_and_innovation_hubs.pdf
  7. European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA, ESMA). 2023. Joint Report on Innovation Facilitators: Regulatory Sandboxes and Innovation Hubs. December 2023. https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/publications/joint-esas-report-innovation-facilitators-innovation-hubs-and-regulatory-sandboxes_en
  8. GAUDEUL, A. et al. 2024. Understanding the Impact of Human Oversight on Discriminatory Outcomes in AI-Supported Decision-Making. ECAI 2024. 392, 1067-1074. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA240598 Go to original source...
  9. HANDRLICA, J., SHARP, V., NEŠPOR J. 2023. Forum shopping in regulatory sandboxes and the perils of experimental law-making. Juridical Tribune. 13(3), 408-425. https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/3.05 Go to original source...
  10. HESEKOVA BOJMIROVA, S. 2021. FinTech and Regulatory Sandbox - New Challenges for the Financial Market. Juridical Tribune. 12(3), 85-100. Go to original source...
  11. KOVAC M. 2022. Autonomous Artificial Intelligence and Uncontemplated Hazards: Towards the Optimal Regulatory Framework. European Journal of Risk Regulation. 13(1), 94-113. https://doi:10.1017/err.2021.28 Go to original source...
  12. LAUX, J., RUSCHEMEIER, H. 2025. Automation Bias in the AI Act: On the Legal Implications of Attempting to De-Bias Human Oversight of AI. arXiv. 2502.10036. https://doi:10.48550/arXiv.2502.10036 Go to original source...
  13. MINISTERSTVO PRŮMYSLU A OBCHODU ČESKÉ REPUBLIKY. 2021. Národní plán obnovy České republiky. https://www.planobnovycr.cz/
  14. PALMIOTTO, F. 2024. When Is a Decision Automated? A Taxonomy for a Fundamental Rights Analysis. German Law Journal. 25, 210-236. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.112. Go to original source...
  15. RAUDLA, R., JUUSE, E., KUOKŠTIS, V., CEPILOVS, A., CIPINYS, V., YLÖNEN, M. 2024. To sandbox or not to sandbox? Diverging strategies of regulatory responses to FinTech. Regulation & Governance. 18(4), 612-635. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12630 Go to original source...
  16. RAUDLA, R., JUUSE, E., KUOKSTIS, V. et al. 2024. Regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs for FinTech: experiences of the Baltic states. Eur J Law Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-024-09830-y Go to original source...
  17. TRUBY, J., BROWN, R. D., IBRAHIM, I. A., CAUDEVILLA PARELLADA, O. 2022. A Sandbox Approach to Regulating High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Applications. European Journal of Risk Regulation. 13(2), 270-294. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2021.52 Go to original source...
  18. WHELANOVÁ, M. 2019. Implementace přímo použitelných nařízení Evropské unie do českého právního řádu. Správní právo. 52(6), 62-89.