DOI - Mendel University Press

DOI identifiers

DOI: 10.11118/978-80-7701-082-5-0171

Prison Tattoos in the Context of Identity and Group Affiliation

Alena Lochmannová ORCID...1, Ondřej Kolář ORCID...1
1  Police Academy of the Czech Republic in Prague, Lhotecká 559/7, 143 00 Praha 4-Kamýk, Czech Republic

This article examines tattooing in prison as a structured social practice rather than a purely individual act of body decoration. Drawing on long-term qualitative research conducted in Czech prisons since 2013, including ethnographic observation, interviews with inmates and staff, and systematic documentation of tattoo motifs, placement, and modes of acquisition, the study analyses how tattoos operate within the social order of imprisonment. Findings show that tattoos function as a coded visual language through which inmates communicate identity, affiliation, credibility, and status. In certain internally regulated groups, access to specific motifs is restricted and their use is tied to an acknowledged position within the group. In this context, tattooing becomes a form of symbolic capital: it is visible, collectively recognized, and subject to enforcement by others rather than controlled solely by the individual. The analysis further demonstrates that the meaning of a tattoo is not defined only by the motif, but also by its placement on the body, its visibility in everyday interaction, and the conditions under which it was acquired. Tattoos obtained at the cost of physical pain and institutional risk are read as evidence of resilience and reliability, whereas coercively imposed tattoos may serve as instruments of humiliation and long-term subordination. These dynamics indicate that tattooing in prison should not be viewed only as an issue of discipline or as a simple marker of “criminal identity,” but as a medium through which hierarchy is maintained, autonomy is negotiated, and power is exercised on and through the body.

Keywords: Tattooing in Prison, Symbolic Capital, Inmate Hierarchy, Bodily Marking, Carceral Identity

pages: 171-176, online: 2026



References

  1. BOURDIEU, P. 1986. The Forms of Capital. In: RICHARDSON, J. G. (Ed.). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood Press, pp. 241-258.
  2. CLEMMER, D. 1940. The Prison Community. The Christopher Publishing House.
  3. DIRGA, L., LOCHMANNOVÁ, A., JUŘÍČEK, P. 2015. The Structure of the Inmate Population in Czech Prisons. Sociológia - Slovak Sociological Review. 47(6), 559-578. https://www.sav.sk/?lang=en&doc=journal-list∂=article_response_page&journal_article_no=11698
  4. GALLÈ, F., VALERIANI, F., MAROTTA, D., DE GIORGI, A., BARGELLINI, A., BIANCO, A., COLUCCI, M. E., CONIGLIO, M. A., DALLOLIO, L., DE GIGLIO, O., DI GIUSEPPE, G., DIELLA, G., LAGANÀ, P., LICATA, F., LIGUORI, G., MARCHESI, I., MARINI, S., MONTAGNA, M. T., NAPOLI, C., … PROTANO, C. 2021. What about Your Body Ornament? Experiences of Tattoo and Piercing among Italian Youths. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(23), 12429. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH182312429 Go to original source...
  5. GELL, A. 1993. Wrapping in Images: Tattooing in Polynesia. Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  6. GOFFMAN, E. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situations of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Doubleday (Anchor Books).
  7. GUSTAFSON, W. M. 1997. Inscripta in froute: Penal tattooing in late antiquity. Classical Antiquity. 16(1), 79-105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25011055 Go to original source...
  8. JERRENTRUP, M. T. 2024. The Body, the Spirit, and the Other: Yantras as Embodied Cultural Integration. Social Sciences. 13(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/SOCSCI13010034 Go to original source...
  9. JONES, C. P. 1987. Stigma: Tattooing and Branding in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. The Journal of Roman Studies. 77, 139-155. https://doi.org/10.2307/300578 Go to original source...
  10. LOCHMANNOVÁ, A. 2015. Tetování jako vzkaz: Vybrané tělesné mutilace vězeňské subkultury. Culturologia. 2015(1), 8-16.
  11. LOCHMANNOVÁ, A. 2016. Vězeňský trh: Hybridní barter a komoditní peníze v prostředí českých věznic. Acta Filozofické Fakulty Západočeské Univerzity v Plzni. 8(1), 5-22.
  12. LOCHMANNOVÁ, A. 2017. Tělo jako plátno: Reflexe vězeňského tetování z perspektivy vězeňských tatérů. Acta Filozofické Fakulty Západočeské Univerzity v Plzni. 9(3), 7-25. http://hdl.handle.net/11025/29765
  13. LOCHMANNOVÁ, A. 2019. Zasloužit si být mužem: Bolest jako atribut maskulinity ve vězeňském prostoru. In: SOUKUP, M. (Ed.). Tělo 2.1: Bolest v proměnách času a kultur. Červený Kostelec : Pavel Mervart, pp. 103-132.
  14. LOCHMANNOVÁ, A. 2020a. Konstrukce, deklarace a manifestace kriminální identity v reflexi druhého života odsouzených: Příklad ruskojazyčné kriminální subkultury. Acta Fakulty Filozofické Západočeské Univerzity v Plzni. 12(1), 36-60. Go to original source...
  15. LOCHMANNOVÁ, A. 2020b. Tělo za katrem. Academia.
  16. LOCHMANNOVÁ, A., KOLÁŘ, O. 2021. Extremism behind Bars. Západočeská univerzita v Plzni. Go to original source...
  17. PHELAN, M. P., HUNT, S. A. 1998. Prison Gang Members' Tattoos as Identity Work: The Visual Communication of Moral Careers. Symbolic Interaction. 21(3), 277-298. https://doi.org/10.1525/SI.1998.21.3.277 Go to original source...
  18. RYCHLÍK, M. 2005. Tetování, skarifikace a jiné zdobení těla. NLN - Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.
  19. RYCHLÍK, M. 2022. Dějiny lidí. Academia.
  20. SYKES, G. 1958. The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. Princeton University Press.
  21. TANNENBAUM, N. 1987. Tattoos: Invulnerability and Power in Shan Cosmology. American Ethnologist. 14(4), 693-711. https://doi.org/10.1525/AE.1987.14.4.02A00060 Go to original source...