DOI - Mendel University Press

DOI identifiers

DOI: 10.11118/978-80-7701-082-5-0177

Analysis of the Driving Assistant Systems and their Impact on Human Behavior and Mind: Philosophy and Methodology of the Planned Research

Ingrid Matoušková ORCID...1, Karel Pavlica ORCID...2
1 ŠKODA Auto University, Department of Human Resource Management, Na Karmeli 1457, 293 01 Mladá Boleslav, Czech Republic
2 AMBIS vysoká škola, a. s. Lindnerova 575/1, 180 00 Praha, Libeň, Czech Republic

The paper explains the research philosophy and methodology for the project “Synchronising Development of the Assistant Systems with the Capacities of the Human Mind.” There exist two basic paradigms of conceptualizing the relationships between human beings and technologies. Within the prosthetic paradigm, technology is perceived and understood as a tool that increases and enlarges human abilities, skills, and range of action. Within the aesthetic paradigm, technology is perceived as an integral component of human beings and their world. In our view, it is necessary to refer to both of these paradigms in our research. With respect to this assumption, the following research questions have been proposed: 1. What is the optimum amount of assistant systems for drivers? 2. Which technologies and assistant systems actually help drivers, and which are useless and/or even harmful to them? 3. How do drivers adapt to driving assistant systems? Planned empirical research on samples of both professional and “ordinary” drivers will seek to answer all of these research questions.

Keywords: Aesthetic Paradigm, Cyberpsychology, Drivers, Driving Assistant Systems, Pilot Study, Prosthetic Paradigm

pages: 177-182, online: 2026



References

  1. BERNAHRD, C., HECHT, H. 2020. The Ups and Downs of Camera-Monitor Systems: The Effect of Camera Position on Rearward Distance Perception. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 63(3), 415-432. Go to original source...
  2. CORBETT, J. M. 2009. Technology. In: HANCOCK, P., SPICER, A. (Eds.). Understanding Corporate Life. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 10-26. Go to original source...
  3. CRABU, S., MAGAUDDA, P. 2018. Bottom-up Infrastructures: Aligning Politics and Technology in Building a Wireless Community Network. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 27, 149-176. Go to original source...
  4. GRAICHEN, L. et al. 2019. Evaluation of Gesture-Based In-Vehicle Interaction: User Experience and the Potential to Reduce Driver Distraction. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 61(5), 774-792. Go to original source...
  5. HO CHANG, C. et al. 2020. Can Cognitive Style Predict Adoption of an Emerging Technology? A Study of Cognitive Style and its Influence on the Perception of a New Technology. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction. 16(1), 18-35. Go to original source...
  6. KOPENCOVÁ, D., FELCAN, M., RAK, R. 2021. Equilibrium and Limit States in Technical and Social Disciplines as Part of Risk Analysis and Management. In: ABDEL WAHAB, M. (Ed.). Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Structural Damage Modelling and Assessment. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 110. Singapore: Springer. ISBN 978-981-15-9120-4 Go to original source...
  7. LEE, J. D. et al. 2019. Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles with a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 63(2), 197-209. Go to original source...
  8. MILLER, E., BOYLE, L. N. 2018. Behavioral Adaptations to Lane Keeping Systems: Effects of Exposure and Withdrawal. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 61(1), 152-164. Go to original source...
  9. MLEKUS, L. et al. 2020. How to Raise Technology Acceptance: User Experience Characteristics as Technology-Inherent Determinants. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO). 51, 273-283. Go to original source...
  10. MUSLIM, H., ITOH, M. 2020. Long-Term Evaluation of Drivers' Behavioral Adaptation to an Adaptive Collision System. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 63(7), 1295-1315. Go to original source...
  11. SULER, J. R. 2016. Psychology of the Digital Age: Humans Become Electric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  12. ŠKODA STORYBOARD. 2020. Asistenční systémy ve vozech ŠKODA pomáhají, varují a aktivně chrání. Tisková zpráva. Škoda. [Accessed: 14 July 2020]. https://www.skoda-storyboard.com/cs/tiskove-zpravy-archiv
  13. TENHUNFELD, N. L. et al. 2019. Trust and Distrust of Automated Parking in a Tesla Model X. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 62(2), 194-210. Go to original source...
  14. VEJAČKA, M. 2016. Citizen Adoption of eGovernment in Slovakia. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences. 39(7), 1395-1404.
  15. WU, X., BOYLE, L. 2020. Auditory Messages for Intersection Movement Assist (IMA) Systems: Effects of Speech- and Nonspeech-Based Cues. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 63(2), 336-347. Go to original source...
  16. ZHENG, J. et al. 2021. Vibration Warning Design for Reaction Time Reduction under the Environment of Intelligent Connected Vehicles. Applied Ergonomics. 96, 103490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103490 Go to original source...
Return