DOI - Mendel University Press

DOI identifiers

DOI: 10.11118/978-80-7701-082-5-0209

Regional Disparities and the Perception of Sustainability in the Czech Republic

Ladislava Míková1, Václav Friedrich ORCID...1, Pavlína Forstová Kuráňová ORCID...1
1 Faculty of Economics, VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 2172/15, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic

The concept of sustainable development, formulated in the 1987 report of the World Commission on Environment and Development chaired by Gro Harlem Brundtland, is today widely accepted and provides a fundamental framework for environmental, economic, and social policies at both national and regional levels. Nevertheless, sustainability cannot be understood as a universally perceived concept, since its three pillars may be emphasised differently depending on the specific conditions of each region. This study focuses on the Czech Republic at the NUTS 3 level. It examines the extent to which regional disparities – in economic performance, social cohesion, and environmental quality – influence how sustainability is perceived by the population. The research is based on a questionnaire survey conducted among residents of individual regions, complemented by an analysis of statistical data from the Czech Statistical Office. The results indicate that different regions tend to prioritise different pillars of sustainability, with these variations reflecting local socioeconomic and environmental contexts. Such findings suggest that perceptions of sustainability are not homogeneous but shaped by region-specific conditions. The discussion also addresses the Parthenon, where pillars stand independently side by side, and the Venn diagram, which highlights their interconnectedness and mutual interdependence. The study concludes that effective sustainability policy must be sensitive to regional contexts and to the chosen interpretative framework.

Keywords: Sustainable Development, Regional Disparities, Perception of Sustainability, Regional Context, Sustainability Models

pages: 209-215, online: 2026



References

  1. DYLLICK, T., HOCKERTS, K. 2002. Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment. 11(2), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323 Go to original source...
  2. EMANUEL, R., ADAMS, J. N., VYAS, D. 2011. Sustainability: Three pillars and four E's. Journal of Sustainability Education. 2(1), 1-8.
  3. EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY. 2024. Delivering Justice in Sustainability Transitions. Euroepan Environment Agency. [Accessed: 15 December 2025] https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/delivering-justice-in-sustainability-transitions
  4. FRIEDRICH, V. 2017. Postojové a hodnotící ąkály v marketingu a managementu: Vybrané statistické metody a aplikace. SAEI. Vol. 46. Ostrava: V©B-TU Ostrava.
  5. GÜRTLER, K. 2024. What role for sustainability in post-fossil regional transition? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 26(6), 575-591. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2024.2389837 Go to original source...
  6. JORDAN, J., TENZING, J. 2024. Social Foundations of a Just Coal Transition. World Bank. [Accessed: 15 December 2025] http://hdl.handle.net/10986/42538 Go to original source...
  7. LIKERT, R. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology. 140, 5-55.
  8. MANGALAGIU, D. et al. (Eds.). 2024. Exploring transition in coal- and carbon-intensive regions. In: Positive Tipping Points Towards Sustainability. Springer Climate. Cham: Springer, pp. 135-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50762-5_7 Go to original source...
  9. MEY, F. 2024. From grey to green? Tipping a coal region incrementally. Global Environmental Change. 82, 102836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102836 Go to original source...
  10. OLUOCH, S., PANDIT, N., HARNER, C. 2025. Socio-economic and environmental trade-offs of sustainable energy transition in Kentucky. Sustainability. 17(15), 7133. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157133 Go to original source...
  11. PUKOWIEC-KURDA, K. 2024. From coal to tourism: A game-changer in the sustainable transition process. Journal of Tourism Futures. 10(3), 454-468. Go to original source...
  12. PURVIS, B., MAO, Y., ROBINSON, D. 2019. Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science. 14, 681-695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5 Go to original source...
  13. WORLD COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. WORLD COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT. 1991. Our Common Future (Czech ed.). Praha: Academia.
  15. ZAIONTZ, C. 2025. Real Statistics Using Excel. Version 9.4.5. Computer software. [Accessed: 15 December 2025] https://www.real-statistics.com