DOI - Mendel University Press

DOI identifiers

DOI: 10.11118/978-80-7701-082-5-0350

Social Competence in the 65+ Population

Miluše Vítečková ORCID...1, Miroslav Procházka ORCID...1, Lenka Kamanová ORCID...2
1 Faculty of Education, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Jeronýmova 10, 371 15 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
2 Institute of Lifelong Learning, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 5, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

This paper examines social competence in the 65+ population based on a qualitative study involving 25 participants aged 65 and older. The research defines social competence as the ability to initiate and maintain meaningful social interactions. The study is part of a broader project Support and Development of Financial, Digital, Social, and Health Literacy among the 65+ Population (TAČR, TQ01000591). Through in-depth interviews, the study identified areas of social competence deficits. Participants described challenging situations in their social interactions, recognizing their own limitations and describing how they try to address them when dealing with people or institutions. Many expressed feelings of resignation or submission in demanding social contexts. The most common social barriers included shyness, low assertiveness, fear of rejection or criticism, and, in some cases, overly aggressive responses. These behaviours often stem from a lack of support or targeted educational opportunities. The findings suggest that older adults face specific social challenges that may impede their daily activities and overall well-being. The identified barriers offer valuable insights for developing educational programs aimed at strengthening social competence among older adults.

Keywords: Social Competence, 65+ Generation, Social Interactions, Qualitative Survey

pages: 350-356, online: 2026



References

  1. ARGYLE, M. 1967. The Psychology of Interpersonal Behaviour. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
  2. BALTES, P. B., BALTES, M. M. 1990. Successful Aging: Perspectives from the Behavioral Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  3. BARTÁK, J. 2025. Sociální kompetence. Praha: Grada.
  4. CACIOPPO, J. T. and CACIOPPO, S. 2018. The growing problem of loneliness. The Lancet. 391(10119), 426-427. Go to original source...
  5. CORBIN, J., STRAUSS, A. 1999. Základy kvalitativního výzkumu. Boskovice: Albert.
  6. FRATIGLIONI, L., PAILLARD-BORG, S., WINBLAD, B. 2004. An active and socially integrated lifestyle in late life might protect against dementia. The Lancet Neurology. 3(6), 343-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00767-7 Go to original source...
  7. FREUND, A. M., BALTES, P. B. 2000. The orchestration of selection, optimization and compensation: An action-theoretical conceptualization of a theory of developmental regulation. In: PERRIG, W. J., GROB, A. (Eds.). Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of August Flammer. 35-58. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605412-3 Go to original source...
  8. GILLERNOVÁ, I., KREJČOVÁ, L. 2012. Sociální dovednosti ve škole. Praha: Grada Publishing.
  9. HENRY, J. D., PHILLIPS, L. H., RUFFMAN, T., BAILEY, P. E. 2013. A meta-analytic review of age differences in theory of mind. Psychology and Aging. 28(3), 826-839. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030677 Go to original source...
  10. HOLT-LUNSTAD, J., SMITH, T. B., LAYTON, J. B. 2010. Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine. 7(7), e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 Go to original source...
  11. HOLT-LUNSTAD, J., SMITH, T. B., BAKER, M., HARRIS, T., STEPHENSON, D. 2015. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 10(2), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352 Go to original source...
  12. HOSKOVCOVÁ, S., VAŠEK, Z. 2017. Inventář sociálních kompetencí (ISK): Česká adaptace Inventar sozialer Kompetenzen U.P. Kanninga. Praha: Hogrefe - Testcentrum.
  13. KUIPER, J. S., ZUIDERSMA, M., OUDE VOSHAAR, R. C., ZUIDEMA, S. U., VAN DEN HEUVEL, E. R., STOLK, R. P., SMIDT, N. 2015. Social relationships and risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Ageing Research Reviews. 22, 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2015.04.006 Go to original source...
  14. KYNAST, J., QUINQUE, E. M., POLYAKOVA, M., LUCK, T., RIEDEL-HELLER, S. G., BARON-COHEN, S., HINZ, A., WITTE, A. V., SACHER, J., CILLRINGER, A., SCHROETER, M. L. 2020. Mindreading From the Eyes Declines With Aging - Evidence From 1, 603 Subjects. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.550416 Go to original source...
  15. MOJŽÍŠOVÁ, A., BŘÍZOVÁ, B. 2021. Social Support for Seniors Living in the Home Environment. Caritas et veritas. 11(1), 234-243. https://doi.org/10.32725/cetv.2021.020 Go to original source...
  16. NEŠPOR, Z. 2018. Kompetence sociální. Sociologická encyklopedie. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR. [Accessed: 13 Sept. 2025] https://encyklopedie.soc.cas.cz/w/Kompetence_soci%C3%A1ln%C3%AD
  17. PARK, J. H., KANG, S. W. 2023. Social Interaction and Life Satisfaction among Older Adults by Age Group. Healthcare. 11(22), 2951. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11222951 Go to original source...
  18. PAULÍK, K. 2017. Psychologie lidské odolnosti. Praha: Grada.
  19. ROSE-KRASNOR, L. 1997. The nature of social competence: A theoretical review. Social Development. 6(1), 111-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.1997.tb00097.x Go to original source...
  20. RIGGIO, R. E. 1986. Assessment of Basic Social Skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51(3), 649-660. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.649 Go to original source...
  21. RICHTER, D., KUNZMANN, U. 2011. Age differences in three facets of empathy: performance-based evidence. Psychology and Aging. 26(1), 60-70. Go to original source...
  22. RUFFMAN, T., HENRY, J. D., LIVINGSTONE, V., PHILLIPS, L. H. 2008. A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: Implications for neuropsychological models of aging. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 32(4), 863-881. Go to original source...
  23. RYAN, E. B., MEREDITH, S. D., MACLEAN, M. J., ORANGE, J. B. 1995. Changing the way we talk with elders: Promoting health using the Communication Enhancement Model. International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 41(2), 89-107. Go to original source...
  24. SALTHOUSE, T. A. 2010. Major Issues in Cognitive Aging. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195372151.001.0001 Go to original source...
  25. SHEN, T., LI, D., HU, Z., LI, J., WEI, X. 2022. The impact of social support on the quality of life among older adults in China: An empirical study based on the 2020 CFPS. Frontiers in Public Health. 10:914707. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.914707 Go to original source...
  26. STEK, M. L., VINKERS, D. J., GUSSEKLOO, J., BEEKMAN, A. T., VAN DER MAST, R. C., WESTENDORP, R. G. 2005. Is depression in old age fatal only when people feel lonely? American Journal of Psychiatry. 162(1), 178-180. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.1.178 Go to original source...
  27. ŠEĎOVÁ, K. 2007. Analýza kvalitativních dat. In: ŠVAŘÍČEK, R., ŠEĎOVÁ, K. (Eds.). Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách. Praha: Portál, pp. 207-247.
  28. ŠOUKALOVÁ, K., HRUBIŠOVÁ, Š., PROCHÁZKOVÁ, R. 2016. Kvalita života seniorů v domově pro seniory. Florence. 6, 9-11. [Accessed: 13 Sept. 2025] https://www.florence.cz/casopis/archiv-florence/2016/6/kvalita-zivota-senioru-v-domove-pro-seniory/
  29. ÜNALAN, D., YAYLA, E. N., BAYDUR, H., ALTAN, F. 2023. The Effect of Perceived Social Support Systems and Empowerment Approaches on the Quality of Life in Elderly Patients. European Journal of Geriatric and Gerontology. 5(2), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2022.2022-10-7 Go to original source...
  30. VALIŠOVÁ, A., KASÍKOVÁ, H. (Eds.). 2010. Pedagogika pro učitele. Praha: Grada Publishing.