DOI - Vydavatelství Mendelovy univerzity v Brně

Identifikátory DOI

DOI: 10.11118/978-80-7701-087-0-0320

RECREATION IN CZECH NATIONAL PARKS: TOURISM INTENSITY VS. VULNERABILITY OF PRIORITY AREAS

Tomáš Janík1,2, Vladimír Zýka2, Martin Erlebach3, Dana Fialová4, Tereza Kůsová4, Jiří Vágner4, Jan Pergl5, Jiří Sádlo5, Josef Kutlvašr5,6, Klára Kušková5,7, Michaela Vítková5, Barbora Mrkvová2, Dušan Romportl1,2
1 Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, 128 00 Praha, Czechia
2 Department of Spatial Ecology, Landscape Research Institute, Květnové náměstí 391, 252 43 Průhonice, Czechia
3 Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, Palacký University in Olomouc, 17. listopadu 12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czechia
4 Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, 128 00 Praha, Czechia
5 Department of Invasion Ecology, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS), Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czechia
6 Department of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Praha – Suchdol, 165 00, Czechia
7 Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Praha – Suchdol, 165 00, Czechia


This study demonstrates how high-value protected areas are increasingly exposed to anthropogenic pressures, particularly landscape fragmentation and intensive tourism. Using Krkonoše National Park (KRNAP) as a case study, we integrated biological and environmental data describing natural values and invasive plant occurrence with spatial indicators of tourism intensity and recreational use. These datasets were synthesized to develop a typology capturing the relationships between ecological sensitivity and potentially harmful human activities. Our results indicate that the most valuable and vulnerable sites are concentrated in the core zones of the national park and, with the exception of built-up areas and their surroundings, significantly overlap with the most frequently visited locations. The approach presented here will be extended to all national parks in Czechia in the coming years. In the context of steadily increasing visitor numbers, understanding these interactions represents a critical prerequisite for the effective management of protected areas.

Klíčová slova: anthropogenic pressure, Krkonoše, landscape fragmentation, protected areas

stránky: 320-324, Publikováno: 2026, online: 2026



Reference

  1. Janík, T., Zýka, V., Demková, K., Havlíček, M., Borovec, R., Lichová, A., Mrkvová B, Romportl R. (2024). Anthropogenic pressure in Czech protected areas over the last 60 years: A concerning increase. Landscape and Urban Planning, 250, 105146. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  2. Butler, R. W. (1980). The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution: Implications for management of resources. Canadian Geographer, 24(1), 5-12. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  3. Hall, C. M., Williams, A. M. (2008). Tourism and innovation. London: Routledge. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  4. Jaeger, J. A. G. (2000). Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Landscape Ecology, 15, 115-130. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  5. Moilanen, A., Franco Aldina, M. A., Early Regan I., Fox R., Wintle B., Thomas C., D. (2005). Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B., 272, 1885-1891. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  6. Moss, L. A. G. (2006). The amenity migrants: Ecological challenge to contemporary Shangri-La. In L. A. G. Moss (Ed.), The amenity migrants: Seeking and sustaining mountains and their cultures (pp. 3-26). Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  7. Moser, B., Jaeger, J. A. G., Tappeiner, U., Tasser, E. (2007). Modification of the effective mesh size for measuring landscape fragmentation to solve the boundary problem. Landscape Ecology, 22, 3, 447-459. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  8. Müller, D. K. (2011). Second homes in the Nordic countries. In C. M. Hall & D. K. Müller (Eds.), Tourism, mobility and second homes: Between elite landscape and common ground (pp. 15-32).