DOI - Mendel University Press

DOI identifiers

DOI: 10.11118/978-80-7509-832-0-0237

VZDELÁVANIE VYSOKOŠKOLSKÝCH UČITEĽOV NA UNIZA: SEBAPERCEPCIA UČITEĽOV A UŽITOČNOSŤ VZDELÁVANIA

Jana Trabalíková

In this paper we present the situation in the area of university teacher education in the field of Engineering Pedagogy at the University of Žilina in the context of lifelong learning. We present how we identified and responded flexibly to the educational needs of university teachers in relation to their teaching activities at the university. Our aim was to find out in what direction set this education in terms of content, scope and methods to develop teacher skills markedly. We were particularly interested in the teaching skills that would subsequently support the key competences of students in the best way. Analysis of educational needs of university teachers is based on data processed from questionnaires. The questionnaires were administered to university teachers always at the beginning of the course of engineering pedagogy in three academic years 2017/18, 2018/19 and 2019/20. A total number of university teachers who completed the questionnaire is 32. Based on the results of the questionnaires, we modified the content and methods of the course. From the analysis of the educational needs of university teachers we have found that it is most useful for teachers to learn about student motivation, innovative teaching strategies, creating a friendly social environment for students, effective management of student group work and self-reflection.

Keywords: educational needs, engineering pedagogy, pedagogical erudition, university teacher

pages: 237-244, online: 2022



References

  1. Adamec, P. & Kryštof, D. (2021). Feedback from realised courses aimed at developing teaching competences of university teachers. In: EDULEARN21 - International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies Proceedings (s. 3079-3084). International Academy of Technology, Education and Development. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2021.0658 Go to original source...
  2. Bajtoš, J. (2013). Didaktika vysokej školy. Bratislava: Iura Edition.
  3. Beneš, M. (2008). Andragogika. Praha: Grada.
  4. Gavora, P. et al. (2010). Elektronická učebnica pedagogického výskumu. Bratislava: UK. Dostupné z: http://www.e-metodologia.fedu.uniba.sk/index.php/kapitoly/posudzovacie-skaly/vyhodnotenie.php?id=i13p6
  5. Hrebeňárová, L. & Trabalíková, J. (2018). Kontexty podpory profesijného rozvoja učitelstva. In: Pavlov, I. (Ed.), Kontexty podpory profesijného rozvoja učitelstva (s. 113-126). Banská Bystrica: Belianium.
  6. Manniová, J. (2014). Kľúčové kompetencie vysokoškolského učiteľa v humanitných, spoločenských a technických vedách. Dostupné z: http://jaroslavbalvin.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Manniova.pdf
  7. Mužík, J. (2004). Androdidaktika. Praha: ASPI.
  8. Plamínek, J. (2014). Vzdělávání dospělých. Praha: Grada.
  9. Sirotová, M. (2014). Vysokoškolský učiteľ v edukačnom procese. Trnava: UCM FF.
  10. Slavík, M. et al. (2012). Vysokoškolská pedagogika. Praha: Grada.
  11. Turek, I. (2006). Základy didaktiky vysokej školy. Bratislava: STU.
  12. Turek, I. (2008). Majú mať učitelia vysokých škôl aj pedagogickú kvalifikáciu? Media4u Magazine, 4, 3-9. https://http://www.media4u.cz/mm042008.pdf
  13. Vaněček, D. et al. (2016). Didaktika technických odborných predmetov. Praha: ČVUT.
  14. Vašašová, Z. et al. (2016). Psychológia učenia dospelých. Banská Bystrica: UMB.
  15. Vašutová, J. (2005). Pedagogické vzdělávání vysokoškolských učitelů jako aktuální potřeba. AULA, 13(3), 73-78.