DOI - Mendel University Press

DOI identifiers

DOI: 10.11118/978-80-7509-957-0-0082

THE LINKS BETWEEN FREEDOM AND THE INTERNET IN SOUTHEAST ASIA: A DEMOCRATIC COUP OR STATUS QUO TIME?

Martin Petlach1, Amar Khairi1
1 Faculty of Regional Development and Territorial Studies, Mendel University in Brno, Třída Gen. Píky 2005/7, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

The last two decades have witnessed a striking increase in the number of Internet users as well as new mechanisms of Internet controls have been introduced in many regimes. The objective of this analysis is to appraise how the growth of online population and Internet controls impact on the state of freedoms and democracy in Southeast Asia. The authors argue that the Internet has maintained its ambiguous role within democracy in the examined region. Four groups of countries were identified in the cluster analysis in accordance with the state of variables in the examined years of 2017 and 2020. The results then stressed that the rising figures of online population had been accompanied by additional restrictions of Internet freedoms. At the same time, the percentage of online population has not proved to be a sufficiently significant variable.

Keywords: demokracie, digitalizace, internet, jihovýchodní Asie, cenzura, svoboda

pages: 82-89, online: 2023



References

  1. ABBOTT, J. (2012): Democracy@internet.org revisited: Analysing the socio-political impact of the Internet and new social media in East Asia. Third World Quarterly 33(2), 333-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2012.666015 Go to original source...
  2. ABBOTT, J. (2013): Assessing the social and political impact of the Internet and new social media in Asia. Journal of Contemporary Asia 43(4), 579-590. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2013.785698 Go to original source...
  3. CROISSANT, A., HAYNES, J. (2021): Democratic regression in Asia. Democratisation 28(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1851203 Go to original source...
  4. CURATO, N., FOSSATI, D. (2020): Authoritarian innovations: Crafting support for a less democratic Southeast Asia. Democratisations 27(6), 1006-1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1777985 Go to original source...
  5. DIAMOND, L. (2020): Democratic regression in comparative perspective: Scope, methods, and causes. Democratisation 28(1), 22-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1807517 Go to original source...
  6. FRAIOLI, P. (2021): Asia's new generation of pro-democracy protesters. Strategic Comments 27(4), vii-ix. https://doi.org/10.1080/13567888.2021.1949140 Go to original source...
  7. JAYASURIYA, K. RODAN, G. (2007): Beyond hybrid regimes: More participation, less contestation in Southeast Asia. Democratisation 14(5), 773-794. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340701635647 Go to original source...
  8. KURTLANTZICK, J. (2022): Why democracy in Southeast Asia will worsen in 2023. Council of Foreign Relations [online]. Available at: https://www.cfr.org/blog/why-democracy-southeast-asia-will-worsen-2023
  9. LAI, C.-H. (2011): A multifaceted perspective on blogs and society: Examples of blogospheres in Southeast and East Asia. The Journal of International Communication 17(1), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2011.559156 Go to original source...
  10. LEE, S. H. (2017): Digital democracy in Asia: The impact of the Asian internet on political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 14(1), 62-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1214095 Go to original source...
  11. MAUZY, L. (1997): The human rights and 'Asian values' debate in Southeast Asia: Trying to clarify the key issues. The Pacific Review 10(2), 210-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512749708719218 Go to original source...
  12. MORGENBESSER, L., Weiss, M. L. (2018): Survive and thrive: Field research in authoritarian Southeast Asia. Asian Studies Review 42(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2018.1472210 Go to original source...
  13. MORSE, Y. L. (2012): The era of electoral authoritarianism. World Politics 64(1), 161-198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887111000281 Go to original source...
  14. RODAN, G. (1998): Asia and the international press: The political significance of expanding markets. Democratisation 5(2), 125-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510349808403562 Go to original source...
  15. RÜLAND, J. (2021): Democratic backsliding, regional governance, and foreign policymaking in Southeast Asia: ASEAN, Indonesia, and the Philippines. Democratisation 28(1), 237-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1803284 Go to original source...
  16. SINPENG, A. (2020): Digital media, political authoritarianism, and Internet controls in Southeast Asia. Media, Culture & Society 42(1), 25-39. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719884052 Go to original source...
  17. TAPSELL, R. (2021): Social media and elections in Southeast Asia: The emerge of subversive, underground campaigning. Asian Studies Review 45(1), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2020.1841093 Go to original source...
  18. UFEN, A. (2008): The 2008 election in Malaysia: Uncertainties of electoral authoritarianism. Taiwan Journal of Democracy 4(1), 155-169. 10.29654/tjd.200807.0007
  19. WEISS, M. L. (2021): Can civil society safeguard rights in Asia? Asian Studies Review 45(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2020.1828274 Go to original source...
  20. YANGYUE, L. (2014): Transgressiveness, civil society and Internet control in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review 27(3), 383-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.909520 Go to original source...