DOI - Mendel University Press

DOI identifiers

DOI: 10.11118/978-80-7509-996-9-0297

STANOVENÍ CELKOVÉHO OBSAHU OXIDU SIŘIČITÉHO A PODÍLU JEHO VOLNÉ FORMY V CITRONOVÉ ©«ÁVĚ A OCHUCOVADLECH NA JEJÍ BÁZI / DETERMINATION OF THE TOTAL CONTENT OF SULFUR DIOXIDE AND THE PROPORTION OF ITS FREE FORM IN LEMON JUICE AND FLAVORINGS BASED ON IT

Jan Pospíąil1, Kateřina Debreczeniová1
1 Ústav hygieny a technologie potravin ľivočiąného původu a gastronomie FVHE, VETUNI, Palackého třída 1, 612 42 Brno

This work deals with the comparison of the total content of SO2 and the amount of its free form, which is responsible for the antibacterial and antioxidant properties of SO2 in food. The subject of the research was lemon juice available on the Czech market and flavorings based on it. Twenty-two products were divided into 2 groups: SO2 treated products (n=10) and SO2 free products (n=12). The analysis was performed spectrophotometrically using analytical sets K-TSULPH and K-FSULPH (Megazyme Ltd., IE). Total content of SO2 in treated products ranged between 37–364 mg.l-1, while the free form was present in the amount of 20–186 mg.l-1. In 20% of the samples, the proportion of its free form was very low, even though the total SO2 content was considerable. Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was demonstrated in the total SO2 content between the treated and non-treated products. The legislative limit of 350 mg.l-1 was exceeded only in one sample, when the determined value was 364 ± 6 mg.l-1.

Keywords: sulfites, fruit juices, free sulfites, lemon seasonings, Ellman’s reagent

pages: 297-302, online: 2024



References

  1. Adams, J. B. (1997): Food additive-additive interactions involving sulphur dioxide and ascorbic and nitrous acids: A review. Food Chemistry, 59(3): 401-409. Go to original source...
  2. Bayati, A., Nazari, F., Hassanzadazar, H., Hosseini, M. (2020): Identification parameters for comparison of naturally and commercially lime juice. Carpathian Journal of Food Science and Technology,12(1): 110-119. DOI 10.34302/crpjfst/2020.12.1.11. Go to original source...
  3. European Food Safety Authority (2016): Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of sulfur dioxide (E 220), sodium sulfite (E 221), sodium bisulfite (E 222), sodium metabisulfite (E 223), potassium metabisulfite (E 224), calcium sulfite (E 226), calcium bisulfite (E 227) and potassium bisulfite. EFSA Journal, 14(4). DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4438. Go to original source...
  4. Miranda, G., Berna, A., Salazar, D., Mulet, A. (2009): Sulphur dioxide evolution during dried apricot storage. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 42(2): 531-533. DOI 10.1016/j.lwt.2008.08.008. Go to original source...
  5. Nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady č. 1169/2011 ze dne 15. října o poskytování informací o potravinách spotřebitelům. Úřední Věstník Evropské unie.
  6. Nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady č. 1333/2008 ze dne 16. prosince o potravinářských přídatných látkách. Úřední Věstník Evropské unie.