DOI - Mendel University Press

DOI identifiers

DOI: 10.11118/978-80-7701-049-8-0138

VPLYV DRUHU A PROVENIENCIE REPRODUKČNÉHO MATERIÁLU NA RAST, FENOTYPOVÚ KVALITU A VEGETAČNÚ FENOLÓGIU MLADÝCH JEDINCOV DUBA ZIMNÉHO A DUBA LETNÉHO / THE ROLE OF A SPECIES AND PROVENANCE OF PLANTING STOCK ON GROWTH, STEM QUALITY, DAMAGE AND VEGETATIVE PHENOLOGY OF YOUNG SESSILE AND PEDUNCULATE OAKS

Roman Longauer1,2, Veronika Přikrylová1
1 Lesnická a dřevařská fakulta, Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Česká republika
2 Národné lesnícke centrum – Sekcia pre vedu a výskum, T. G. Masaryka 22, 96001 Zvolen, Slovensko

The paper analyses the role of species and source population (provenance) of the planting stock of sessile and pedunculate oaks in the beech forest zone (alt. 550 m) in PLO 30 Drahanská Highland, Czechia. Sets of trees representing 5 sessile oak and 4 pedunculate oak provenances were studied in a provenance trial (7–9 years after outplanting) with focus on the survival rate, growth, stem quality, damage, spring phenology (budburst and leaf flushing), lammas growth and autumn leaf senescence. In the trial located at its local altitudinal maximum, sessile oak had higher mean height, lower proportion of damaged individuals, better stem quality, and it flushed earlier than alochtonous pedunculate oak. As to the role of provenance of planting stock, it has influenced the height, survival rate, budburst and leaf development of both oak species, as well as the stem quality of sessile oak. Across the species and provenances, individuals which flushed earlier and ceased vegetation later in autumn, were higher, had better stem quality, more and longer lammas shoots, and less damage.

Keywords: sessile and pedunculate oak, provenances, survival, growth, spring and autumn phenology, lammas shoots, stem form, damage

pages: 138-144, Published: 2025, online: 2025



References

  1. Benedíková, M. 2003. Výsledky hodnocení 15letých provenienčních ploch dubu. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu. 48(4), 182-195.
  2. Buriánek, V., Benedíková, M., Malá, J. 2015. Selekce klonů dubu na odolnost vůči pozdním mrazům. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu. 60(1), 182-195.
  3. Caudullo, G., Welk, E., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. 2017. Chorological maps for the main European woody species. Data in Brief. 12, 662-666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.007 Go to original source...
  4. Firmat, C., Delzon, S., Louvet, J.-M., Parmentier, J., Kremer, A. 2016. Evolutionary dynamics of the leaf phenological cycle in an oak meta-population along an elevation gradient. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 30(12), 2116-2131. Go to original source...
  5. Zhang, K.-L., Huang, S.-Y., Li, Y., Chen, M.-X., Zhu, F.-Y. a Fang, Y.-M. 2025. Genetic and Epigenetic Views of the Adaptive Evolution of Oaks (Quercus L.). Plant, Cell & Environment. 48, 6307-6320. Go to original source...
  6. Koblížek, J., Úradníček, L. 2000. Rozlišování dubů a možnosti udržení druhové čistoty v lesních porostech. Sborník ze semináře. Roztoky u Křivoklátu: Česká lesnická společnost, 12. 9. 2000, 78s.
  7. Kremer, A., Hipp, A. 2020. Oaks: an evolutionary success story. New Phytologist. 226, 987-1011. Go to original source...
  8. Mueller, M., Gailing, O. 2019. Abiotic genetic adaptation in the Fagaceae. Plant Biology. 21(5), 783-795. Go to original source...
  9. Piao, Š., Liu, Q., Chen, A., Janssens, I.A., Fu, Y., Dai, J., Liu, L., Lian, X., Shen, M., Zhu, X. 2019. Plant phenology and global climate change: Curent progresses and challenges. Global Change Biology. 25: 1922-1940. Go to original source...
  10. Rzońca, M. et al. 2015. Oak (Quercus spp.) specific protocols. In: TREES4FUTURE - Designing Trees for the Future. Trees4future. 12-15. https://www.trees4future.eu/uploads/ t4fdeliverables/T4F_D21_submitted.pdf
  11. SAS Institute. 2004. Base SAS 9.4 Procedures Guide. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.