DOI - Mendel University Press

DOI identifiers

DOI: 10.11118/978-80-7701-082-5-0022

Restrictions on the Rights of Security Forces, the Principle of Proportionality, and Loyalty: Challenges for Security and Regional Development in the V4 Countries

Kateřina Blažková ORCID...1
1 Department of Private Law, Faculty of Security Management, Police Academy of the Czech Republic in Prague, Lhotecká 559/7, 143 00 Prague 4 - Kamýk, Czech Republic

The article focuses on the restriction of fundamental rights of members of security forces in the Czech Republic and the V4 countries. It analyzes the legal framework of these restrictions, in particular the prohibition of strikes, political activities, restrictions on business, and the right of association, and their compliance with the principle of proportionality. A comparative approach shows that all V4 countries apply a similar model of depoliticized and disciplined forces, with restrictions enshrined in the constitution and in line with European case law. The study emphasizes that the legitimacy of restrictions is conditional on their proportionality and fair compensation for members. Special attention is paid to the relationship between legal limits, motivation, and loyalty, which fundamentally affect the stability of the forces and thus regional development. In conclusion, the article states that the current legal framework is fundamentally sound, but the challenge for the future remains to maintain a balance between protecting security and respecting the rights of individuals.

Keywords: Security Forces, Restrictions of Fundamental Rights, Proportionality, V4 Countries, Political Neutrality, European Case Law

pages: 22-30, online: 2026



References

  1. BLAŽKOVÁ, K. 2025. Rights of members of security forces: international and national perspectives on restrictions. Security Theory and Practice. 1(1), 57-74. ISSN 1801-8211
  2. CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC. 1996. Ruling Pl. ÚS 15/96 (N 99/6 SbNU 213; No. 280/1996 Coll.).
  3. CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC. 2018. Ruling Pl. ÚS 24/17 (No. 235/2018 Coll.).
  4. CZECH REPUBLIC. 1991. Act No. 2/1991 Coll., on collective bargaining.
  5. CZECH REPUBLIC. 1993. Constitutional Act No. 2/1993 Coll., Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms.
  6. CZECH REPUBLIC. 1999. Act No. 221/1999 Coll., on Professional Soldiers.
  7. CZECH REPUBLIC. 2003. Act No. 361/2003 Coll., on the Service Relationship of Members of Security Forces.
  8. CZECH REPUBLIC. 2008. Act No. 273/2008 Coll., on the Police of the Czech Republic.
  9. ČT24. 2024. Some police officers will refuse to issue fines from November 4 to 8. In protest. ČT 24. 24 October 2024. [Accessed: 15 December 2025] https://ct24.ceskatelevize.cz/clanek/domaci/protest-casti-policistu-bude-od-4-do-8-listopadu-nebudou-pokutovat-354692
  10. DE BRAUW. 2015. Dutch Supreme Court - employees may strike earlier and without prior notification. 22 June 2015. De Brauw. [Accessed: 15 December 2025] https://www.debrauw.com/matters/dutch-supreme-court-employees-may-strike-earlier-and-without-prior-notification
  11. EPSU, EUROCOP, EUROMIL. 2022. Trade union rights in the public services: Report to the European Committee of Social Rights. Brussels: EPSU.
  12. HEJČ, D. 2021. Omezení určitých práv u vybraných profesí. [Restrictions on certain rights in selected professions]. In: HUSENÍK, F., BARTOŇ, M., KOKEŠ, M., KOPA, M. et al. Listina základních práv a svobod. Komentář [Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms. Commentary]. Article 44. Prague: C. H. Beck, pp. 941-948. ISBN 978-80-7400-769-8
  13. HUNGARY. 1994. Act XXXIV of 1994 on the Police.
  14. HUNGARY. 2011. Alaptörvény Magyarország [The Fundamental Law of Hungary], Art. 46(5).
  15. HUNGARY. 2015. Act XLII of 2015 on the Service Status of Professional Members of Law Enforcement Agencies (Hszt.).
  16. CHALFIN, A., McCRARY, J. 2017. Criminal deterrence: A review of the literature. Journal of Economic Literature. 55(1), 5-48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20141147 Go to original source...
  17. INDEPENDENT SELF-GOVERNING TRADE UNION OF POLICE OFFICERS. 2024. Statute of the Independent Self-Governing Trade Union of Police Officers. https://nszzp.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Statut-NSZZP-2024.pdf
  18. IROZHLAS. 2024. Police will not issue fines at the beginning of November. iRozhlas. 26 October 2024. [Accessed: 15 December 2025] https://www.irozhlas.cz/zpravy-domov/policie-protest-pokuty-stavka_2410261100_kno
  19. KOUDELKA, Z. 2019. Political neutrality of security forces in a state governed by the rule of law. Prague: C. H. Beck. ISBN 978-80-7400-667-4
  20. KOVAŘÍK, Z. 2012. Problémy profesní motivace pracovníků Policie České republiky [Problems of professional motivation among Czech Police officers]. Brno: Tribun EU. ISBN 978-80-263-0286-5
  21. MADEJ, M. 2018. Meze základních práv v České republice [Limits of Fundamental Rights in the Czech Republic]. Prague: Leges. ISBN 978-80-7502-294-3
  22. MAGYARORSZÁG. 1993. 1993. évi CVII. törvény az Alkotmány módosításáról (§ 40/B (4)).
  23. MATELLY v. France. 2014. App. No. 10609/10. Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2014-V (Eur. Ct. H.R.).
  24. MOLEK, P. 2013. Limits of fundamental rights and freedoms: on the theory of restrictions on fundamental rights. Jurisprudence. 22(3), 12-24. ISSN 1802-3843
  25. ONDŘEJEK, P. 2014. Limitations of fundamental rights in the Czech Republic and the role of the principle of proportionality. European Public Law. 20(3), 451-465. ISSN 1354-3725. https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2014031 Go to original source...
  26. PERRY, J. L., WISE, L. R. 1990. The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review. 50(3), 367-373. https://doi.org/10.2307/976618 Go to original source...
  27. PIOTROWSKI, A., RAWAT, S., BOE, O. 2021. Effects of organizational support and organizational justice on police officers' work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology. 12, 642155. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642155 Go to original source...
  28. POLAND. 1990. Act of April 6, 1990, on the Police.
  29. POLAND. 1991. Act of May 23, 1991, on the resolution of collective disputes.
  30. POLAND. 1997. Constitution of the Republic of Poland of April 2, 1997. Journal of Laws 1997. No. 78, item 483.
  31. POLICE OF FINLAND. 2025. Police and employee unions reach an agreement on protection work during strikes. Poliisi, Police of finland. 18 April 2025. [Accessed: 15 December 2025] https://poliisi.fi/en/-/police-and-employee-unions-reach-an-agreement-on-protection-work-during-strikes-1
  32. POSPÍŠIL, I., LANGÁŠEK, T., ŠIMÍČEK, V., WAGNEROVÁ, E. et al. 2023. Listina základních práv a svobod. Komentář [Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms]. Commentary. 2nd ed. Prague: Wolters Kluwer. ISBN 978-80-7676-747-8
  33. PRAWO.PL. 2018. End of police protest with sick leave. Prawo.pl. 8 November 2018. https://www.prawo.pl/kadry/koniec-protestu-policjantow-ze-zwolnieniami-chorobowymi,326560.html
  34. PRYSMAKOVA, P., VANDENABEELE, W. 2020. Enjoying police duties: Public service motivation and job satisfaction. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 35(3), 304-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09324-7 Go to original source...
  35. REKVÉNYI v. Hungary. 1999. App. No. 25390/94. Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1999-III (Eur. Ct. H.R.).
  36. SLOVAK REPUBLIC. 1992. Constitution of the Slovak Republic, Constitutional Act No. 460/1992 Coll., Art. 37(4), Art. 54.
  37. SLOVAK REPUBLIC. 1998. Act No. 73/1998 Coll., on the State Service of Members of the Police Force.
  38. SLOVAK REPUBLIC. 2005. Act No. 346/2005 Coll., on the civil service of professional soldiers of the Armed Forces of the Slovak Republic.
  39. SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT. 2023. Judgment No. 8 As 3/2021-45 (No. 4507/2023 Coll. NSS).
  40. ŠIMÍČEK, V. 2010. On certain aspects of the principle of proportionality in the decisions of the Constitutional Court. Jurisprudence. 19(3), 21-28. ISSN 1802-3843
  41. Tettrekész Magyar Rendőrség Szakszervezete (TMRSZ). [2025.] n.d. TMRSZ. [Accessed: 15 December 2025] https://tmrsz.hu/
  42. TYSON, J., CHARMAN, S.-J. 2023. Organisational (in)justice and the relationship with police officer retention. Criminology & Criminal Justice. 25(4), 1016-1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958231191648 Go to original source...
  43. VOGEL, D., KROLL, A. 2019. Agreeing to disagree? Explaining self-other disagreement on leadership behavior. Public Management Review. 21(12), 1867-1892. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1577910 Go to original source...
  44. WOLFE, S. E., LAWSON, S. G. 2020. The organizational justice effect among criminal justice employees: A meta-analysis. Criminology. 58(4), 619-644. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12251 Go to original source...
Return