DOI: 10.11118/978-80-7701-082-5-0376
Social Acceptance of Nanotechnologies in old Industrial Regions
- Jan ®enka
ORCID...1, Simona Bartoąová ©»astná
ORCID...1, Jan Píąa
ORCID...1, David Vogt
ORCID...1, Marie Cviková
ORCID...1 - 1 University of Ostrava, Department of Human and Regional Development, Chitussiho 10, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
The main aim of this paper is to identify factors that affect social acceptance of nanotechnologies at two distinct levels: individual and regional. Focusing on the context of old industrial regions (OIRs), key barriers of effective diffusion of nanotechnologies and path upgrading will be listed and discussed. At the individual level, the role of cognitive, affective and sociocultural factors together with moderating variables (sociodemographic, geographic and contextual) is outlined. At the regional level, adoption of nanotechnologies in OIRs is shaped by institutional path dependence, lock-in, and inherited industrial cultures that often favor continuity over radical change. While the application of nanotechnologies can foster modernization based on related diversification, efforts to foster unrelated diversification require targeted policies, strong institutional support and intensive public– private collaboration. Societal willingness to accept new directions of development paths in OIRs depends on the nature and thickness of industrial culture – the degree of community identification with various industrial attributes.
Keywords: Nanotechnologies, Technology Acceptance, Old Industrial Regions, Industrial Path Development
pages: 376-385, online: 2026
References
- BABATUNDE, D. E., DENWIGWE, I. H., BABATUNDE, O. M., GBADAMOSI, S. L., BABALOLA, I. P., AGBOOLA, O. 2020. Environmental and societal impact of nanotechnology. IEEE Access. 8, 4640-4667.
Go to original source... - BENNEWORTH, P., HOSPERS, G. J. 2007. The new economic geography of old industrial regions: Universities as global-local pipelines. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 25(6), 779-802.
Go to original source... - BESLEY, J. C., KRAMER, V. L., PRIEST, S. H. 2008. Expert opinion on nanotechnology: Risks, benefits, and regulation. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 10(4), 549-558.
Go to original source... - BOLE, D. 2021. 'What is industrial culture anyway?' Theoretical framing of the concept in economic geography. Geography Compass. 15(11), 1-16.
Go to original source... - BOLE, D., GOLU®A, M., KOZINA, J. 2024. Linking industrial culture and human agency in three (post)industrial towns: Collective and individual agency shaping development paths. Geoforum. 120(3), 103993.
Go to original source... - BORGATTI, S. P., EVERETT, M. G. 1999. Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks. 21, 375-395.
Go to original source... - BOSCHMA, R. A., MARTIN, R. L. 2010. The handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Go to original source... - BOZEMAN, B., LAREDO, P. , MANGEMATIN, V. 2007. Understanding the emergence and deployment of 'nano' S & T. Research Policy. 36(6), 807-812.
Go to original source... - BUTZIN, A., FLÖGEL, F. 2024. High-tech development for 'left behind' places: Lessons-learnt from the Ruhr cybersecurity ecosystem. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 17(2), 307-321.
Go to original source... - CACCIATORE, M. A., SCHEUFELE, D. A., CORLEY, E. A. 2011. From enabling technology to applications: The evolution of risk perceptions about nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science. 20(3), 385-404.
Go to original source... - CALIGNANO, G., NORDLI, A. J. 2024. Less-advanced regions in EU innovation networks: Could nanotechnology represent a possible trigger for path upgrading? PLOS ONE. 19(1): e0288669.
Go to original source... - CALIGNANO, G., QUARTA, C. A. 2015. The persistence of regional disparities in Italy through the lens of the European Union nanotechnology network. Regional Studies, Regional Science. 2(1), 470-479.
Go to original source... - CAPELLO, R., LENZI, C. 2021. Industry 4.0 and servitisation: Regional patterns of 4.0 technological transformations in Europe. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 173(C), 121164.
Go to original source... - CHOU, K. T., LIOU, H. M. 2023. Carbon tax in Taiwan: Path dependence and the high-carbon regime. Energies. 16(1), 513.
Go to original source... - COBB, M. D. 2005. Framing effects on public opinion about nanotechnology. Science Communication. 27(2), 221-239.
Go to original source... - COBB, M. D., MACOUBRIE, J. 2004. Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 6(4), 395-405.
Go to original source... - COENEN, L., MOODYSSON, J., MARTIN, H. 2015. Path renewal in old industrial regions: Possibilities and limitations for regional innovation policy. Regional Studies. 49(5), 850-865.
Go to original source... - CORTINOVIS, N., XIAO, J., BOSCHMA, R., VAN OORT, F. G. 2017. Quality of government and social capital as drivers of regional diversification in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography. 17(6), 1179-1208.
Go to original source... - CUNNINGHAM, S. W., WERKER, C. 2012. Proximity and collaboration in European nanotechnology. Papers in Regional Science. 91(4), 723-742.
Go to original source... - DAVIS, F. D., BAGOZZI, R. P., WARSHAW, P. R. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science. 35(8), 982-1003.
Go to original source... - EVANGELISTA, R., MELICIANI, V., VEZZANI, A. 2018. Specialisation in key enabling technologies and regional growth in Europe. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 27(3), 273-289.
Go to original source... - FIORENTINO, S., GLASMEIER, A. K., LOBAO, L., MARTIN, R., TYLER, P. 2024. 'Left behind places': What are they and why do they matter? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 17(1), 1-16.
Go to original source... - FORAY, D., DAVID, P. A., HALL, B. H. 2011. Smart specialisation - From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation. MTEI-Working Paper-2011-001.
- DAVIS, F. D., VENKATESH, V. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science. 46(2), 186-204.
Go to original source... - FRENKEN, K., VAN OORT, F., VERBURG, T. 2007. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies. 41(5), 685-697.
Go to original source... - FRIEDMAN, M. 2009. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- GEORGE, S., KAPTAN, G., LEE, J., FREWER, L. 2014. Awareness on adverse effects of nanotechnology increases negative perception among public: Survey study from Singapore. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 16(12), 2751.
Go to original source... - GLÜCKLER, J., SHEARMUR, R., MARTINUS, K. 2023. Liability or opportunity? Reconceptualizing the periphery and its role in innovation. Journal of Economic Geography. 23(1), 231-249.
Go to original source... - GÖRMAR, F. 2024. Weaving a foundational narrative - Place-making and change in an old-industrial town in East Germany. European Planning Studies. 32(11), 2338-2359.
Go to original source... - GRABHER, G. 1993. The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in Ruhr area. In: The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks. London: Routledge, pp. 255-277.
- GRILLITSCH, M., SOTARAUTA, M. 2019. Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography. 44(4), 704-723.
Go to original source... - GUPTA, N., FISCHER, A. R. H., FREWER, L. J. 2011. Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: A review. Public Understanding of Science. 21(7), 782-795.
Go to original source... - GUPTA, N., FISCHER, A. R. H., FREWER, L. J. 2015. Ethics, risk and benefits associated with different applications of nanotechnology: A comparison of expert and consumer perceptions of drivers of societal acceptance. NanoEthics. 9(2), 93-108.
Go to original source... - GUPTA, N., FISCHER, A. R. H., GEORGE, S., FREWER, L. J. 2013. Expert views on societal responses to different applications of nanotechnology: A comparative analysis of experts in countries with different economic and regulatory environments. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 15(8), 1838.
Go to original source... - HASSINK, R. 2010. Regional resilience: A promising concept to explain differences in regional economic adaptability? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 3(1), 45-58.
Go to original source... - HASSINK, R., ISAKSEN, A., TRIPPL, M. 2019. Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies. 53(11), 1636-1645.
Go to original source... - HO, S. S., SCHEUFELE, D. A., CORLEY, E. A. 2010. Making sense of policy choices: Understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 12(8), 2703-2715.
Go to original source... - HO, S. S., SCHEUFELE, D. A., CORLEY, E. A. 2011. Value predispositions, mass media, and attitudes toward nanotechnology: The interplay of public and experts. Science Communication. 33(2), 167-200.
Go to original source... - HWANG, K. H., CHAN-OLMSTED, S. M., NAM, S. H., CHANG, B. H. 2016. Factors affecting mobile application usage: Exploring the roles of gender, age, and application types from behaviour log data. International Journal of Mobile Communications. 14(3), 256-272.
Go to original source... - ISAKSEN, A. 2014. Industrial development in thin regions: Trapped in path extension? Journal of Economic Geography. 15(3), 585-600.
Go to original source... - ISENBERG, D. 2011. The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Dublin, Ireland: Institute of International and European Affairs, pp. 1-13.
- KAHAN, D. M., BRAMAN, D., SLOVIC, P., GASTIL, J., COHEN, G. 2013. Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. In: The feeling of risk: New perspectives on risk perception. 87, 307-314.
- KANT, V. 2017. Revisiting the technologies of the old: A case study of cognitive work analysis and nanomaterials. Cognition, Technology and Work. 19(1), 47-71.
Go to original source... - LEE, C. J., SCHEUFELE, D. A., LEWENSTEIN, B. V. 2005. Public attitudes toward emerging technologies: Examining the interactive effects of cognitions and affect on public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Science Communication. 27(2), 240-267.
Go to original source... - LEE, D., RHEE, Y., DUNHAM, R. B. 2009. The role of organizational and individual characteristics in technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 25(7), 623-646.
Go to original source... - LEE, E. W. J., HO, S. S. 2015. The perceived familiarity gap hypothesis: Examining how media attention and reflective integration relate to perceived familiarity with nanotechnology in Singapore. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 17(5), 228.
Go to original source... - LIBERTY, J. T., ANIL, A., IJIMDIYA, S. J., KWAJI, M. J., IJIMDIYA, R. U. 2024. Harnessing the potential of nanostructured materials for sustainable development. Nano-Structures and Nano-Objects. 38, 101216.
Go to original source... - MACKINNON, D. 2012. Beyond strategic coupling: Reassessing the firm-region nexus in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography. 12(1), 227-245.
Go to original source... - MACKINNON, D., BÉAL, V., LEIBERT, T. 2024. Rethinking 'left-behind' places in a context of rising spatial inequalities and political discontent. Regional Studies. 58(6), 1161-1166.
Go to original source... - MACKINNON, D., KEMPTON, L., O'BRIEN, P., ORMEROD, E., PIKE, A., TOMANEY, J. 2022. Reframing urban and regional 'development' for 'left behind' places. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 15(1), 39-56.
Go to original source... - MACOUBRIE, J. 2006. Nanotechnology: Public concerns, reasoning and trust in government. Public Understanding of Science. 15(2), 221-241.
Go to original source... - MANGEMATIN, V., ERRABI, K. 2012. The determinants of science-based cluster growth: The case of nanotechnology. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 30(1), 128-146.
Go to original source... - MARTIN, R., SUNLEY, P. 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography. 6(4), 395-437.
Go to original source... - MASKELL, P., MALMBERG, A. 2007. Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution. Journal of Economic Geography. 7(5), 603-618.
Go to original source... - MCKAY, L., JENNINGS, W., STOKER, G. 2024. Understanding the geography of discontent: Perceptions of government's biases against left-behind places. Journal of European Public Policy. 31(6), 1719-1748.
Go to original source... - MORRIS, M. G., VENKATESH, V., ACKERMAN, P. L. 2005. Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: An extension to the theory of planned behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 52(1), 69-84.
Go to original source... - NEFFKE, F., HARTOG, M., BOSCHMA, R., HENNING, M. 2018. Agents of structural change: The role of firms and entrepreneurs in regional diversification. Economic Geography. 94(1), 23-48.
Go to original source... - NEWEY, L. R., COENEN, L. 2022. Lock-in, paradox and regional renewal. Regional Studies. 56(8), 1333-1346.
Go to original source... - NILSEN, T., GRILLITSCH, M., HAUGE, A. 2023. Varieties of periphery and local agency in regional development. Regional Studies. 57(4), 749-762.
Go to original source... - NISBET, M. C., GOIDEL, R. K. 2007. Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: Bridging the ethnographic-survey research divide. Public Understanding of Science. 16(4), 421-440.
Go to original source... - NORRIS, L., BRISTOW, G., COTTERILL, E., HEALY, A., MARSHALL, A.P. 2024. Decarbonisation, place attachment and agency: Just transition in old industrial regions. Contemporary Social Science. 19(1-3), 283-302.
Go to original source... - NUUR, C., LAESTADIUS, S. 2010. Development in peripheral regions: Case studies in Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies. 17(3), 293-307.
Go to original source... - PALMBERG, C., NIKULAINEN, T. 2006. Industrial renewal and growth through nanotechnology? An overview with focus on Finland. ETLA Discussion Papers. 1020.
- PIKE, A., RODRÍGUEZ-POSE, A., TOMANEY, J. 2007. What kind of local and regional development and for whom? Regional Studies. 41(9), 1253-1269.
Go to original source... - PILLAI, G. R., BEZBARUAH, A. N. 2017. Perceptions and attitude effects on nanotechnology acceptance: An exploratory framework. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 19(2), 41.
Go to original source... - PͩA, J. 2023. How individuals become agents of change in old industrial regions. Regional Studies, Regional Science. 10(1), 592-602.
Go to original source... - QUATRARO, F., SCANDURA, A. 2024. The contribution of academic inventors to regional technological diversification: The Italian evidence. Journal of Economic Geography. 24(6), 785-819.
Go to original source... - RATHORE, A., MAHESH, G. 2021. Public perception of nanotechnology: A contrast between developed and developing countries. Technology in Society. 67, 101751.
Go to original source... - ROBINSON, D. K. R., RIP, A., DELEMARLE, A. 2016. Nanodistricts: Between global nanotechnology promises and local cluster dynamics. In: The local configuration of new research fields: On regional and national diversity. Springer, pp. 117-133.
Go to original source... - RODRÍGUEZ-POSE, A., DIJKSTRA, L, POELMAN, H. 2024. The geography of EU discontent and the regional development trap. Economic Geography. 100(3), 213-245.
Go to original source... - ROMIG, A. D., BAKER, A. B., JOHANNES, J., ZIPPERIAN, T., EIJKEL, K., KIRCHHOFF, B., MANI, H. S., RAO, C. N. R., WALSH, S. 2007. An introduction to nanotechnology policy: Opportunities and constraints for emerging and established economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 74(9), 1634-1642.
Go to original source... - SAVIOTTI, P. P., FRENKEN, K. 2008. Export variety and the economic performance of countries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 18(2), 201-218.
Go to original source... - SCHEUFELE, D. A., CORLEY, E. A., SHIH, T. J., DALRYMPLE, K. E., HO, S. S. 2009. Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. Nature Nanotechnology. 4(2), 91-94.
Go to original source... - SCHTÜZ, H., WIEDEMANN, P. M. 2008. Framing effects on risk perception of nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science. 17(3), 369-379.
Go to original source... - SENOCAK, E. 2014. A survey on nanotechnology in the view of the Turkish public. Science, Technology and Society. 19(1), 79-94.
Go to original source... - SIMONE, A. 2023. The sources of unrelated diversification and its implications for lagging regions. GeoJournal. 88(2), 2139-2152.
Go to original source... - SIMONS, J., ZIMMER, R., VIERBOOM, C., HÄRLEN, I., HERTEL, R., BÖL, G. F. 2009. The slings and arrows of communication on nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 11(7), 1555-1571.
Go to original source... - STAM, E., VAN DE VEN, A. 2021. Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics. 56(2), 809-832.
Go to original source... - STIHL, L. 2024. Local culture and change agency in old industrial places: Spinning forward and digging deeper. European Planning Studies. 32(3), 586-606.
Go to original source... - TÖDTLING, F., SKOKAN, K., HÖGLINGER, C., RUMPEL, P., GRILLITSCH, M. 2013. Innovation and knowledge sourcing of modern sectors in old industrial regions: Comparing software firms in Moravia-Silesia and Upper Austria. European Urban and Regional Studies. 20(2), 188-205.
Go to original source... - VANDERMOERE, F., BLANCHEMANCHE, S., BIEBERSTEIN, A., MARETTE, S., ROOSEN, J. 2010. The morality of attitudes toward nanotechnology: About god, techno-scientific progress, and interfering with nature. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 12(2), 373-381.
Go to original source... - VENKATESH, V., MORRIS, M. G., DAVIS, G. B., DAVIS, F. D. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly. 27(3), 425-478.
Go to original source... - VENKATESH, V., THONG, J. Y. L., XU, X. 2012. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly. 36(1), 157-178.
Go to original source... - VENKATESH, V., THONG, J. Y. L. and XU, X. 2016. Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 17(5), 328-376.
Go to original source... - ®ENKA, J., MACHÁČEK, J., KRTIČKA, L., MICHNA, P. and KOŘÍZEK, P. 2021. Acceptance of a smartphone navigation application by hospital patients and visitors: The role of gender, age, and education. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin. 70(2), 149-161.
Go to original source...

